"Parrish seeks council seat in Mississauga," trumpets the headline in today's Globe and Mail.
Wow. Municipal election coverage in The Globe in January. What's going on?
The celebrity factor is going on, of course.
In a story that stretches right across the top of A9, Carolyn Parrish's political federal history is regurgitated to the nth detail, with nary a mention of her years as a school trustee and local school board chair because, you know, that was before she hit the big time.
Neither the Globe story or a similar one in The Star last week mentioned former Ward 7 councillor Ron Starr, who registered to become the new Ward 6 councillor before Parrish did. He's just as well-known in this community as the former MP.
But then, Starr never did a two-step on a Bush doll on national TV, was never profiled in several pages of Toronto Life and never debated with Wolf Blitzer and Tucker Carlson (no relation to George) on CNN.
My guess is that, by now, Starr is starting to figure out just how stacked against him the media deck is going to be in this election.
Through the process of scoffing at George Bush and ruffling the feathers of the American right , Parrish has morphed into one of those figures who somehow's gotten bigger than the political process itself.
She's in Sheila Copps, Dougie Gilmour, Svend Robinson, Don Cherry, yes ... even Hazel McCallion territory now.
It's inherently unfair that Parrish can command all this attention from the outset and garner publicity that no other candidate in Mississauga can expect, although it's clearly not her fault either.
The Globe article implies that Parrish is lowering herself to seek a council seat.
"Carolyn Parrish wants a job that involves debating urban sewer systems and how to foil the gypsy moth," it sniffs, as if representing people's needs in the neighbourhoods where they live each and every day is somehow beneath a real politician.
Hard as it is to believe, Carolyn Parrish, or rather the cult of Carolyn Parrish, looks as if it's going to overshadow the rest of this election campaign.
If I'm Ms. Parrish, I'm actually a little worried about this phenomenon.
The cult of personality has a double edge.
Do you suppose some of those voters in Ward 6 will be suspicious of Parrish's motives for gracing their ward with her political baggage?
Do you suppose that some of them might actually relish the opportunity to vote against her and tell the rest of the world that they aren't automatically genuflecting at the feet of the idol?
There's something about an annointed superstar candidate (Michael Ignatieff, anyone?) that just gets under people's skins.
Comments (3)
Parrish is up to her old tricks getting attention any way she can.. swearing and stomping is not politically correct ( she probably skipped those classes on the Hill) and she has not learned this lesson so give her an F. She got booted out of Caucus for her temper tantrums.
But on the other hand give her an A+ for getting lots of press...
it is quite clear the woman is out to get attention...
Is ward 6 a stepping stone for her to become MAYOR? No way. NO WAY!
Posted by Irene Gabon | February 2, 2006 1:46 PM
Posted on February 2, 2006 13:46
The reality here is we are once again dealing with a politician whi is self-entitled. No question that when the average voter goes to the poles name recognition is all important-something that is reinforced by the attitudes of the newspapers. When I was considering running for Ward six-a ward that I did represent and was qualified to represent again-one of my reasons for stepping down was the willingness of the media to help politicians who sell newspapers, help ratings etc to achieve their selfish entitlements.Another was being sick of watching these people get their way time and time again.
Posted by Ted Blackmore | February 1, 2006 4:52 PM
Posted on February 1, 2006 16:52
I can't help but wonder if this election will turn (regrettably) into something of a referendum on whether one approves of Parrish's performance and behaviour.
aside from Hazel she's arguably the most well known politician the city has ever seen.
Ron Starr is a good guy and Parrish has a lengthy history of public service but when you get right down to it i think this is going to be more a vote on her personality then it will be on local issues.
PS- the globe did kind of look down on municipal government in that article but that tends to happen when you focus on national/international issues.
Posted by OJ | January 30, 2006 4:41 PM
Posted on January 30, 2006 16:41